Somali vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Immigrants from Liberia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Immigrants from Liberia
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,253,282 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,184,573 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.585 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Somali | Immigrants from Liberia |
Minimum | 4.2% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 42.2% | 40.1% |
Range | 38.0% | 37.0% |
Mean | 12.6% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.0% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Immigrants from Liberia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Jamaica (11.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Ecuador (11.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.1%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 11.0% |
Comanche | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 11.0% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |