South African vs Ute Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
South African
Ute
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
South Africans
Ute
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Ute Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,617,887 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 41.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Ute |
Minimum | 2.1% | 9.2% |
Maximum | 34.6% | 86.0% |
Range | 32.6% | 76.9% |
Mean | 13.6% | 34.2% |
Median | 12.5% | 26.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 45.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 27.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 21.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 21.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Native Hawaiian (15.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Norway | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Palestinians | 91.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |