South American vs Immigrants from Belgium Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Immigrants from Belgium
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Immigrants from Belgium
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Immigrants from Belgium Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,993,980 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,269,497 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Immigrants from Belgium |
Minimum | 9.4% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 46.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.3% | 93.7% |
Mean | 20.2% | 30.1% |
Median | 19.5% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 34.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 23.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Immigrants from Belgium by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Polish (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Cameroon (19.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ukrainian (19.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |