Soviet Union vs Armenian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Armenian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Armenians
8.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Armenian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,074,733 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Armenian |
Minimum | 0.36% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 18.3% | 22.0% |
Range | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Mean | 6.5% | 8.2% |
Median | 6.2% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Armenians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Pakistani (8.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (8.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Paraguayan (8.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Native Hawaiian (8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Icelander (8.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (8.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ukraine (8.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 91.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Paraguayans | 91.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Palestinians | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Soviet Union | 90.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Pakistanis | 90.8 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Icelanders | 90.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 89.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 8.4% |
Argentineans | 89.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 8.4% |
Portuguese | 89.2 /100 | #129 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 88.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 8.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 8.4% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 8.4% |
Sri Lankans | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 8.5% |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |