Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Turkey
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Turkey
11.7%
POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Turkey Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,977,543 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.96%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Turkey |
| Minimum | 0.29% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 22.6% | 68.6% |
| Range | 22.3% | 64.4% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 12.6% |
| Median | 8.3% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Turkey by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |