Spaniard vs Jordanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Spaniard
Jordanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Spaniards
Jordanians
17.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
24.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spaniard vs Jordanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 434,393,372 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,455,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 14.7%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spaniard | Jordanian |
Minimum | 5.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 38.3% |
Range | 94.7% | 36.5% |
Mean | 34.1% | 14.9% |
Median | 20.8% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.0% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.9% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.9% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.7% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.4% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Spaniards by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |