Spanish American Indian vs Turkish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Turkish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Turks
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Turkish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,838,653 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.38%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Turkish |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 62.2% |
| Range | 50.3% | 58.9% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 18.2% |
| Median | 10.4% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Turks by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), South American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |