Spanish vs Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish
Immigrants from Thailand
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish
Immigrants from Thailand
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
21.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish vs Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,834,195 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 4.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish | Immigrants from Thailand |
Minimum | 5.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 44.1% |
Range | 95.0% | 42.3% |
Mean | 24.2% | 17.6% |
Median | 16.3% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.0% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish and Immigrants from Thailand by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Spaniard (13.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (13.8%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |