Sri Lankan vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Chickasaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Sri Lankans
Chickasaw
10.9%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
56.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
73.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Chickasaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 438,555,706 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,403,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.068 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.4% |
| Range | 97.9% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 11.9% |
| Median | 11.3% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Chickasaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Mongolian (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Nonimmigrants (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Syria (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Alaska Native (10.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Ethiopian (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Fijian (10.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |
| Fijians | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 74.9 /100 | #154 | Good 10.7% |
| Chickasaw | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 10.7% |
| Ethiopians | 72.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 71.7 /100 | #158 | Good 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.8 /100 | #159 | Good 10.7% |
| Sudanese | 68.2 /100 | #160 | Good 10.7% |
| Arabs | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 64.8 /100 | #162 | Good 10.8% |
| Tsimshian | 64.5 /100 | #163 | Good 10.8% |
| Potawatomi | 62.6 /100 | #164 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 10.8% |
| Malaysians | 62.0 /100 | #166 | Good 10.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 60.3 /100 | #167 | Good 10.8% |
| Mongolians | 58.0 /100 | #168 | Average 10.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 56.8 /100 | #169 | Average 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 55.8 /100 | #170 | Average 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 55.1 /100 | #171 | Average 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 54.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.9% |