Subsaharan African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
13.3%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,378,936 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.706 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,673,525 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.396 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 26.4% |
| Range | 99.2% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 20.0% | 11.9% |
| Median | 13.9% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |