Subsaharan African vs Yaqui Poverty
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Yaqui
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Yaqui
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
268th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Yaqui Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,618,351 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,716,749 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yaqui and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 3.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Yaqui |
Minimum | 0.57% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 37.5% |
Range | 99.4% | 35.5% |
Mean | 21.1% | 18.1% |
Median | 14.9% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 23.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Yaqui by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.88%), Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yaqui are Inupiat (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latin America (15.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Vietnamese (15.0%, a difference of 0.49%), West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Haiti (15.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 15.1% |