Swedish vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Swedish
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Swedes
Immigrants from China
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 519,531,416 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 24.4% |
| Range | 97.3% | 23.3% |
| Mean | 23.7% | 12.0% |
| Median | 13.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.6% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |