Swedish vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Swedish
Immigrants from Oceania
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Swedes
Immigrants from Oceania
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
74.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swedish vs Immigrants from Oceania Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,559,813 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,448,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 0.24%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swedish | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 62.5% |
| Range | 92.1% | 56.9% |
| Mean | 35.5% | 27.0% |
| Median | 26.8% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.1% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.5% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes and Immigrants from Oceania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |