Thai vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Thai
Bhutanese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Thais
Bhutanese
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Bhutanese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,500,492 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,130,109 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 9.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.53% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 16.2% | 75.4% |
Range | 15.7% | 73.9% |
Mean | 7.6% | 9.4% |
Median | 7.4% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.2% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Thais and Bhutanese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Swiss (9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Luxembourger (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Welsh (9.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Tongan (9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Finnish (9.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Italian (9.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Scotland (9.3%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |