Tohono O'odham vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Marshallese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Marshallese
34.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Marshallese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,585,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 34.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,727,549 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.741 and weighted average of 23.3%, a difference of 46.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Marshallese |
| Minimum | 23.3% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 56.5% |
| Range | 76.7% | 40.3% |
| Mean | 57.1% | 28.7% |
| Median | 53.5% | 25.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.2% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.5% | 34.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 54.3% | 15.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.4% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.8% | 10.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 3.6%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 8.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (23.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |