Tongan vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Tongan
Slovak
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Tongans
Slovaks
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Slovak Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,473,172 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,555,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 17.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Slovak |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 29.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.5% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 12.8% | 26.8% |
| Median | 12.7% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 29.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 15.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 21.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 21.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Tongans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
| Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
| Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
| Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
| French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |