Tongan vs Swiss Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Tongan
Swiss
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Tongans
Swiss
9.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Swiss Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,677,061 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,823,104 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 1.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Swiss |
Minimum | 1.6% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 21.7% | 68.4% |
Range | 20.1% | 65.1% |
Mean | 8.9% | 12.6% |
Median | 7.9% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Swiss by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Italian (9.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Irish (9.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Bhutanese (9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Menominee (9.4%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Scottish (9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), European (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Luxembourger (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Welsh | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Irish | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |