Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
13.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
21.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
78.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,213,293 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,161,655 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 3.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 48.4% |
Range | 28.6% | 46.1% |
Mean | 12.9% | 16.1% |
Median | 13.0% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 11.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Slovene (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (13.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Lithuanian (13.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (13.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Liberians | 25.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | England | 23.4 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 23.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.0% |
Lithuanians | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 21.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.0% |
Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Cuban (12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Okinawan (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Uganda (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |