Turkish vs Greek Male Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Greek
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Turks
Greeks
10.0%
MALE POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
MALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Greek Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,656,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 481,993,852 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Greek |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 0.65% |
| Maximum | 20.9% | 95.7% |
| Range | 18.0% | 95.1% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 15.6% |
| Median | 7.8% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 16.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 16.5% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Greeks by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Serbia (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (10.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Iran (9.9%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Korea (9.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Polish (9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Danish (9.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.0% |