Turkish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Ecuador
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Ecuador
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Ecuador Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,847,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 31.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Ecuador |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 25.9% |
| Range | 22.2% | 23.1% |
| Mean | 10.0% | 14.6% |
| Median | 9.8% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 17.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Cherokee (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guyana (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |