Turkish vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Lithuanian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Turks
Lithuanians
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,836,964 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,877,620 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.2%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 57.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.9% | 99.8% |
Mean | 11.2% | 19.4% |
Median | 10.2% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 16.1% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Lithuanians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Asian (13.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and Luxembourger (13.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |