Turkish vs Sioux Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Turkish
Sioux
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Turks
Sioux
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Sioux Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,163,307 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,565,707 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 52.9%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Sioux |
Minimum | 3.5% | 0.89% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 17.1% | 99.1% |
Mean | 8.8% | 23.4% |
Median | 8.5% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 31.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 21.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 20.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 20.1% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Turks by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Canadians | 98.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Crow (15.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Armenia (15.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Immigrants from Dominica (15.5%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and Central American Indian (15.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.8% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.9% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 16.1% |