Ugandan vs Jordanian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
Jordanian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
Jordanians
12.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Jordanian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,762,990 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,040,584 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.41%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Jordanian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 38.5% | 44.5% |
Range | 36.1% | 39.9% |
Mean | 11.1% | 15.6% |
Median | 10.2% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 16.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Jordanians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Portugal (12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Kenyan (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Morocco (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Iraqi (12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (12.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Armenia (12.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 93.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Kenyans | 93.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Pakistanis | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.4% |