Ute vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Filipino
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Filipinos
21.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Filipino Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,537,245 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,988,571 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 94.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Filipino |
Minimum | 9.2% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 19.0% |
Range | 76.9% | 18.1% |
Mean | 34.2% | 7.9% |
Median | 26.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.5% | 9.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.7% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.2% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are British West Indian (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (21.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Bahamian (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (21.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Seminole (21.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 21.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 21.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.0% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Taiwan (11.0%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from India (10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Thai (11.7%, a difference of 5.1%), Chinese (11.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 10.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |