Ute vs Japanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Japanese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Japanese
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Japanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,332,708 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.504 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 22.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Japanese |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.4% | 99.0% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 23.2% |
| Median | 25.0% | 20.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 16.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Moroccan (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
| German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |