Ute vs Slavic Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Ute
Slavic
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Ute
Slavs
17.9%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Slavic Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,501,714 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.735 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,820,007 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 35.3%.
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Slavic |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 8.9% |
| Maximum | 70.6% | 87.0% |
| Range | 64.1% | 78.1% |
| Mean | 32.1% | 21.3% |
| Median | 23.3% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.2% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 30.9% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.7% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 15.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Ute by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Arapaho (17.8%, a difference of 0.60%), Chippewa (18.0%, a difference of 0.81%), Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Costa Rican (13.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (13.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (13.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Lebanese (13.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Colombians | 77.2 /100 | #145 | Good 13.2% |
| South Americans | 76.9 /100 | #146 | Good 13.2% |
| Europeans | 76.8 /100 | #147 | Good 13.2% |
| Lebanese | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 13.2% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 13.2% |
| Iraqis | 76.0 /100 | #150 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 75.8 /100 | #151 | Good 13.2% |
| Slavs | 75.7 /100 | #152 | Good 13.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 73.7 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Arabs | 73.5 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 72.9 /100 | #155 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 72.0 /100 | #156 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 70.3 /100 | #157 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 69.2 /100 | #158 | Good 13.3% |
| Uruguayans | 66.9 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |