Ute vs Yuman Female Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Yuman
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Ute
Yuman
17.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Yuman Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,666,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 17.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,290 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yuman and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.631 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 19.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Yuman |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 12.1% |
| Maximum | 73.0% | 42.1% |
| Range | 68.4% | 30.1% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 24.5% |
| Median | 17.9% | 22.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.1% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.9% | 32.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Yuman by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Dominica (17.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Congo (17.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 0.81%), Cheyenne (20.2%, a difference of 3.2%), Houma (20.0%, a difference of 4.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and Apache (19.2%, a difference of 8.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |