West Indian vs English Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
West Indian
English
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
West Indians
English
20.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs English Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,644,082 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,761,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 32.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian | English |
Minimum | 5.7% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.5% | 97.8% |
Mean | 21.2% | 28.6% |
Median | 19.8% | 17.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.0% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 26.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 26.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Senegalese (20.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Yaqui (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (20.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Central American (20.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to English by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Pakistani (15.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Pakistanis | 92.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.3% |
English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |