Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Belarus
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Belarus
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
76.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,591,967 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,175,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 30.2% | 41.3% |
| Range | 28.2% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 12.4% | 12.1% |
| Median | 12.1% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Belarus by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Peru (13.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |