Zimbabwean vs Croatian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Croatian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Croatians
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Croatian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,918,028 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 3.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Croatian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 28.1% |
| Range | 5.9% | 26.3% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 6.6% |
| Median | 3.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Croatians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |