Seminole Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Seminole
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Seminole Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
21.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,946,646 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 21.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.73% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Seminole and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Seminole influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Seminole simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Seminole by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Choctaw (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), British West Indian (21.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants from West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Seminole Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Seminole Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.021% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 72.0% |
Range | 16.7% | 69.4% |
Mean | 5.6% | 25.5% |
Median | 3.7% | 22.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 33.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 14.7% |
Correlation Details
Seminole Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.021% | 107,076,040 | 20.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 6,308,200 | 18.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,236,489 | 19.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 893,134 | 19.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 449,021 | 23.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 186,831 | 20.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 137,502 | 30.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.02% | 121,261 | 25.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 175,372 | 18.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 61,427 | 28.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 28,644 | 27.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 9,104 | 15.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 23,824 | 11.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 56,815 | 16.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 7,561 | 13.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 41,884 | 23.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 19,798 | 15.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 21,950 | 27.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.48% | 6,282 | 19.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 1,358 | 13.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 3,378 | 26.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 9,350 | 24.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 6,326 | 9.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 9,976 | 21.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 4,178 | 34.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 3,964 | 33.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.93% | 280 | 58.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.05% | 1,977 | 28.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 162 | 9.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 1,110 | 7.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 292 | 36.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 403 | 9.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 245 | 37.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 1,086 | 39.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.03% | 313 | 71.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 1,190 | 13.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 1,166 | 36.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,805 | 18.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 188 | 40.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.67% | 2,019 | 2.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 405 | 16.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.20% | 174 | 12.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.11% | 445 | 72.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 12,329 | 32.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 372 | 21.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.40% | 2,887 | 18.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.57% | 5,578 | 31.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 1,169 | 27.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.77% | 7,144 | 38.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.01% | 3,124 | 36.2% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.60% | 564 | 55.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 550 | 2.9% |