Burmese vs Immigrants from Bolivia Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 396,748,426 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,455,736 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.53%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Burmese	Immigrants from Bolivia
Minimum	0.60%	0.70%
Maximum	15.4%	18.6%
Range	14.8%	17.9%
Mean	5.6%	5.8%
Median	5.0%	5.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.4%	4.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.0%	7.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.6%	3.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.0%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	2.9%

Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Bolivia by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Welsh (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Senegalese (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from Singapore (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Sri Lankan (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Austrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
South Africans	97.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 5.2%
Serbians	97.0 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Thailand	97.0 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 5.2%
Senegalese	96.5 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 5.2%
Welsh	96.5 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 5.2%
Burmese	96.4 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 5.2%
Japanese	96.4 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	96.3 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	95.9 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	95.6 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 5.2%
Yugoslavians	95.5 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 5.2%
Iranians	95.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 5.2%
Malaysians	95.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 5.2%
Austrians	94.5 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	94.1 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Singapore	93.9 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 5.2%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	93.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 5.2%
Sri Lankans	92.7 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	92.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 5.3%
Immigrants \| Germany	91.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 5.3%
Asians	91.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 5.3%