Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from England
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from England
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from England Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,562,181 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,444,946 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from England |
Minimum | 0.50% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 17.6% | 17.9% |
Range | 17.1% | 17.3% |
Mean | 5.6% | 6.9% |
Median | 4.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from England by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Osage (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and American (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Mongolian (5.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Estonian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Jordanians | 96.4 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 96.3 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Ukrainians | 96.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 95.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Mongolians | 94.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Estonians | 94.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Americans | 94.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 94.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw | 94.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Osage | 94.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Maltese | 94.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 93.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |