Czech vs Slovene Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Czech
Slovene
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Czechs
Slovenes
4.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Slovene Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 478,075,637 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 260,209,646 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Slovene |
Minimum | 0.54% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 18.8% | 18.8% |
Range | 18.3% | 17.3% |
Mean | 4.5% | 4.8% |
Median | 3.8% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Slovenes by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Luxembourger (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Danish (4.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Hmong (4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Chinese (4.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are German (4.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Chinese (4.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Swiss (4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Scandinavian (4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Finns | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |