Ghanaian vs Chippewa Unemployment
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Chippewa
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Ghanaians
Chippewa
6.0%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Chippewa Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,676,370 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,819,653 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ghanaian | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.70% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 13.7% | 50.0% |
Range | 13.0% | 48.1% |
Mean | 6.0% | 11.4% |
Median | 5.6% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Chippewa by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Armenian (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.0%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Central America (6.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Latin America (5.9%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Senegalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ecuadorian (6.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Nepalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Haitian (6.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Central American Indian (6.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 5.9% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.0% |
Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.1% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.2% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.2% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.2% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.2% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.2% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.2% |