Immigrants from Argentina vs Ethiopian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Ethiopian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Ethiopians
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Ethiopian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,999,591 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,927,979 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.75%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 0.70% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 11.2% | 19.3% |
Range | 10.5% | 16.8% |
Mean | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Median | 5.0% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Ethiopians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Chilean (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |