Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Chickasaw
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Chickasaw
5.3%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Congo vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,075,250 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Congo | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 11.0% | 13.2% |
| Range | 10.8% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from Ireland (5.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), South American (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 65.9 /100 | #162 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 65.7 /100 | #163 | Good 5.2% |
| Afghans | 62.0 /100 | #164 | Good 5.3% |
| South Americans | 60.6 /100 | #165 | Good 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 60.2 /100 | #166 | Good 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 57.7 /100 | #168 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 54.1 /100 | #170 | Average 5.3% |
| Peruvians | 51.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 50.8 /100 | #172 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 50.7 /100 | #173 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 48.1 /100 | #175 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
| Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |