Immigrants from Japan vs Burmese Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,448,468 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,115,538 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 1.6%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Japan	Burmese
Minimum	2.7%	1.6%
Maximum	21.1%	25.3%
Range	18.4%	23.7%
Mean	8.4%	9.3%
Median	7.7%	7.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.2%	6.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	10.3%	11.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.1%	4.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.9%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.8%	5.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Burmese by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Australia (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Cuban (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Bhutanese (8.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Arapaho (8.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (8.1%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (8.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Belgium (8.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Nicaraguan (8.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Ireland (8.1%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Japan	99.7 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 8.0%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.7 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 8.0%
Cubans	99.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 8.0%
Bhutanese	99.7 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 8.0%
Arapaho	99.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 8.1%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.7 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	99.7 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 8.1%
Basques	99.5 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 8.1%
New Zealanders	99.5 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Korea	99.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 8.1%
Egyptians	99.5 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 8.1%
Venezuelans	99.5 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 8.1%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.4 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 8.1%
Nicaraguans	99.3 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Belgium	99.3 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 8.2%
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 8.2%