Lithuanian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Czechoslovakian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Lithuanians
Czechoslovakians
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,273,270 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,083,136 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.34%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 40.9% |
Range | 14.4% | 39.6% |
Mean | 5.7% | 7.8% |
Median | 4.7% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Czechoslovakians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and Filipino (4.8%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Scotch-Irish (4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (4.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
Cubans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Poles | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Irish | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |