Maltese vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,326,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,101,177 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and unemployment rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 0.22%.

Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Maltese	Immigrants from South Africa
Minimum	0.60%	2.2%
Maximum	16.7%	52.1%
Range	16.1%	49.9%
Mean	4.9%	11.0%
Median	4.3%	5.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.2%	4.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.5%	10.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.3%	5.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.9%	14.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.9%	13.8%

Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from South Africa by Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Israel (4.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (4.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (4.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Irish (4.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Italy (4.5%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Sri Lankan (4.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Ethiopian (4.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (4.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Nicaraguan (4.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Spain (4.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 35 to 44 years
New Zealanders	90.3 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 4.5%
Romanians	90.3 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.5%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	90.0 /100 \| #110	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	89.8 /100 \| #111	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	89.2 /100 \| #112	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Italy	88.4 /100 \| #113	Excellent 4.5%
Macedonians	88.3 /100 \| #114	Excellent 4.5%
Maltese	88.1 /100 \| #115	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Israel	88.1 /100 \| #116	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Greece	87.9 /100 \| #117	Excellent 4.5%
Irish	87.9 /100 \| #118	Excellent 4.5%
Nicaraguans	87.6 /100 \| #119	Excellent 4.5%
Ethiopians	87.1 /100 \| #120	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| South Africa	86.8 /100 \| #121	Excellent 4.5%
Sri Lankans	86.8 /100 \| #122	Excellent 4.5%
Basques	86.3 /100 \| #123	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Spain	86.1 /100 \| #124	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	86.1 /100 \| #125	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Austria	84.7 /100 \| #126	Excellent 4.5%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	84.7 /100 \| #127	Excellent 4.5%
Czechoslovakians	83.4 /100 \| #128	Excellent 4.6%