Mexican vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
COMPARE
Mexican
Zimbabwean
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Comparison
Mexicans
Zimbabweans
5.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 65 TO 74 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Zimbabwean Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,403,091 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,414,209 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 65 and 74 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%.

Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 26.6% | 28.3% |
Range | 24.9% | 25.4% |
Mean | 6.6% | 7.8% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans and Zimbabweans by Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Cheyenne (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), British West Indian (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Arapaho (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Liberian (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Aleut (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bahamas (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Central America (5.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Dominica (6.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (5.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 65 to 74 years |
Armenians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 5.8% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 5.8% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 5.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 5.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 5.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 5.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 5.9% |
Venezuelans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 5.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 5.9% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 5.9% |
Zimbabweans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 5.9% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 6.0% |