Pima vs Crow Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
COMPARE
Pima
Crow
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Comparison
Pima
Crow
23.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 16 TO 19 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Crow Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,760,058 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377 and weighted average of 23.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,198,478 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 26.2%, a difference of 13.3%.
Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Crow |
Minimum | 11.1% | 4.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 59.4% |
Range | 88.9% | 54.5% |
Mean | 38.5% | 30.6% |
Median | 20.1% | 29.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.1% | 47.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 41.8% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.1% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.1% | 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Crow by Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (23.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.3%, a difference of 0.66%), Tlingit-Haida (23.5%, a difference of 1.7%), Dominican (23.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (22.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from Grenada (25.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (25.7%, a difference of 2.1%), Immigrants from Guyana (25.5%, a difference of 2.9%), Kiowa (25.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and Arapaho (25.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 23.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 23.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.5% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.6% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 24.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.4% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 24.8% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 25.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 26.2% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.5% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.0% |