Bahamian vs Choctaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bahamian
Choctaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bahamians
Choctaw
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Choctaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,114,362 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 25.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 17.2% |
| Range | 20.5% | 15.4% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 6.9% |
| Median | 8.7% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Bahamians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Spanish (7.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Northern European (7.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |