Costa Rican vs Iroquois No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Iroquois
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Costa Ricans
Iroquois
9.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Iroquois No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,314,745 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,994,531 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 14.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 17.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 16.7% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 10.1% |
| Median | 6.6% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Puget Sound Salish (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and Blackfeet (9.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Romanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
| Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |