English vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
English
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
English
Chickasaw
6.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,648,684 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 20.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 15.9% |
| Range | 29.8% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to English by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to English are Norwegian (6.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Danish (6.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Yakama (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), German (6.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |