Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Shoshone No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Shoshone
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Shoshone
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Shoshone No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,763,936 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,540,828 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 8.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Shoshone |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 20.3% | 15.4% |
Range | 18.7% | 14.3% |
Mean | 8.0% | 6.5% |
Median | 7.4% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Pueblo (10.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 34.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 10.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 33.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 10.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |