Immigrants from Germany vs Cuban No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Germany
Cuban
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Germany
Cubans
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Germany vs Cuban No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,346,961 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,809,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 2.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Germany | Cuban |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 75.4% | 20.7% |
| Range | 72.6% | 19.9% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 7.7% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Germany and Cubans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (8.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and Portuguese (8.6%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |