Immigrants from Lithuania vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Estonian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Estonians
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,637,222 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.540 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.060%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Estonian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 47.6% |
Range | 12.8% | 46.8% |
Mean | 5.3% | 7.0% |
Median | 4.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Estonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |