Immigrants from Turkey vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Bhutanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Bhutanese
11.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Bhutanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,854,300 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,743,315 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 31.5%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 49.5% |
Range | 11.3% | 48.0% |
Mean | 8.6% | 7.5% |
Median | 8.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.7% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 6.6% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Houma (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Japan (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.3% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 5.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Cuba (8.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Germany (8.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Canada (8.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |