Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cypriot No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Cypriot
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Cypriots
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Cypriot No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,831,419 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 59.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Cypriot |
Minimum | 0.74% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 35.7% |
Range | 36.8% | 35.1% |
Mean | 7.2% | 8.6% |
Median | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Cypriots by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Alaskan Athabascan (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Israel (15.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.5% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
Albanians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.4% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.4% |